[HAKO]

- 2 - Mais Cultures



An Editorial

Nobody can imagine travelling across the Padana Plain in summer without seeing long rows of corn stretching to the horizon, waving their pollen feathers and jealously hiding their precious, golden ears in their armpits. Yet, if Indians had not given us maize now Italian northeners could not be nicknamed " corn mushers".

Maize has nourished an enormous quantity of the world's peoples that otherwise would have starved. It has been the poor people's staple food because it is cultivated easily and it almost grows by itself. This characteristic made it disliked by the landlords because, as Morelli, pope Pious VI's secretary, stated in late 18th century, landlords "suffer damage without knowing it". In fact "peasants are so fond of Turkish wheat that they are happily busy only in that culture, postponing any other work and neglecting especially the vineyards, already slovenly, and they are also late in breaking the soil for the precious harvest". For this reason many contracts of rent put clauses limiting or even forbidding maize crops. On the other hand maize has been accepted in Africa so eagerly that it entered Yoruba mythology and diffused to India, Tibet and China.

Columbus described America's bountiful fields to his sponsors, implicitly inviting them to invest their riches there: "That large island looked a very high land, not of rugged mountains, but flat with wonderful countryside and looked well cultivated, all or in part, and the crops looked like those of wheat in Cordoba's countryside in May". Those wonderful maize crops were substituted by sugar cane and the native American farmers by African slaves; ironically, La Tortue, the island described by Columbus, became a synonym of the pirates' island.

We dedicate this issue to Indian maize and its wonderful peoples, conscious of having only sketched the subject.

 

Who grew maize?

by Sandra Busatta

At the time of the Spanish Conquest many chroniclers, attentive to the economic chances offered by the new lands, described the Mesoamerican Indian farming techniques. They illustrated accurately the different stages of the slash and burn crop growing, from the fires in the forest to the lavish harvest, as well as the religious ceremonies accompanying them. Poma de Ayala left us a precise set of drawings showing men and women planting maize, the presence of the Inca and his wife at the breaking of the soil and, after that, women and children performing most of the menial tasks . The same can be said of all the so called masculine agriculture of Meso and South America as well as of the ancient agricultural Southwest. The writers describe all the process of cutting and burning, men breaking soil with their special digging stick, and then women helping with their hoes and putting the kernels in the holes, all the weeding, bird scaring, watering, harvesting and putting into the silos, and after all that they state that the old Andean, Mesoamerican and Pueblo farmer was a man! This is a very special case of sexual blindness, since even today poor Indian families sell their work as an economical unit in the poorly mechanized estates, as a waged husband and non waged wife and children.

The crop return of the Aztecs was slightly inferior to the Mayas', but the poor tropical forest soil forced the Mayan farmer in the jungle to use his maize field for one or two years and lie farrow for at least ten , while an Iroquois or Creek woman had to lie fallow and move her village only every 12-20 years.

Andean agriculture was more advanced than that of Mesoamerica, using terraces, irrigation canals and an organization strictly controlled by the State. The Pueblos are the conjunction ring between Mexican and North American agriculture; they also used irrigation, but they had to fight the salinization of the soil provoked by evaporation in the Sonora Desert area. Even if men cultivate the fields, (today exclusively), the property of the land is firmly held by women.

The agricultural techniques in the Western Woodlands and the Prairies of the USA are almost the same, but the great difference is that the digging stick and the hoe are still in the women's hands as well as the property of the land and the crops. The digging stick is even a symbol of womanhood in sacred bundles and other ceremonial paraphernalia in the Plains until reservation times. Women's work was organized in collective bees, very different from the individual toil of the modern Pueblo farmer and witnesses say it was not a very heavy lot. Feminine power on the crops and the control of maize trade has its counterpart in feminine political power in the North American Woodlands, superior to that of Pueblo women. While female horticulturalist power may come from the economic importance of gathering that accounted for about 70- 90% of the balance between meat and vegetable production, it is possible that the major role of the Pueblo man in the fields was favoured not only by the hard Southwest soil and the influence of the more authoritarian cultures that exported southern maize culture, but also by the Spanish mission rule that considered agriculture a man's task. In the East, English and French farming influenced Indian horticulture much later; in late 18th century agriculture became masculine: Indian prophets and reformers favoured the adoption of the European plow and the type of farming and family organization it brought in.

 

 

The Scalp and the Ear of Corn

by S. Busatta

Custer is Dead for your Sins, affirmed Vine Deloria jr. in his 1969 "manifesto", where he supports the idea that scalping was introduced by the whites. He is wrong, as his many polemicist followers, and the Iroquois editor of Scalping and Torture clearly demonstrates it. In fact scalping is part of a very old, pre-columbian religious complex found in various parts of the Americas, from Northern Argentina to the St. Lawrence River. Georg Friederici thinks it had its North American origin in the Southeast of the United States and followed maize northward to the Hudson Valley, where the Mohicans and other Delaware speaking tribes practised it against their Iroquois enemies, who adopted it, but seemed preferring the head cult, also of southern origin. The Pueblos, Pimans, Yumans and later the Navajos scalped ceremonially and among them the Scalp Dance and connected rites are still an important part of their religion.

The Dutch learned the use of scalping from the Mohicans and transformed it from a religious symbol of agrarian fertility into the token for a money reward and then transmitted this desacralized bounty to the English.

The link between the scalp and the ear of corn is showed by the rites of corn husking; it was the only operation to which the Indian man participated, opening the husk and braiding it during a very lively night feast. The process of husking with the husking pin was very similar to that of scalping with a scalping knife and, of course, it did not go unnoticed by the Indians.

Women and scalps are related everywhere. Since 1540 the first conquistadors were shown the rites performed by the Southeastern women in front of the great earthen pyramids, and outraged Franciscan fathers saw Pueblo women having sexual intercourse with scalps in order to adopt and transform them into rain fetishes.

In North America the scalp is always connected to the menstruation and the woman as a farmer well as as the owner of the land. Lévi-Strauss demonstrates that this is the lesson of the myths when they put the origin of the menstruation and that of the scalp (or the first trophy head) in the same story, and concludes that this relationship shows a symbolic connection between marriage and war.

 

 

Maize. Methods of production, tools, and socialization values.

by Flavia Busatta

Indian cultivated fields, where the plants seem to grow heedlessly, are very different from the European idea of a field. Yet the combination of the three sisters, maize, beans and pumpkins offered great advantages. The hard and large leaves of the maize give shadow to the delicate leaves of the beans and its stalk supports the vines. The pumpkins cover almost all the soil between the stalks , efficaciously withhold wet, prevent soil erosion from rain or wind and do not let weeds to grow, reducing hoeing and giving a better crop.

Usually the seeds were planted in concentrical rows in holes made by a digging stick on little dirt mounds ; the seeds therefore were not spread with a large movement of the arm, but put one by one in the holes. Even if this method gives a less abundant crop, it permits the choice of the kernels, helping hybridisation and better crop selection, and explains the unbelievable variety of Indian maizes. Moreover, policulture diminishes parasite insect aggression because a mixed crop attracts predator insects; this was also the function of "pen" plants such as sunflowers in North America. Impollination was made on every single plant because the female hair of the ear was protected by the husk, that protected the kernels from parasites, wind and pollen alike.

Maize typology and cultivation that integrated human beings and plants influenced the co-operative and equalitarian structure of Indian societies, in a way different from the individualist typologies inherent to monocultural crops such as wheat.

Precolumbian America ignored the plow and a most favoured hypothesis about this technological conservatism indicates the cause of it in the lack of burden animals. Men and women used the digging stick and the hoe to open their fields and practised the slash and burn method of horticulture. In some regions of the Mesoamerican jungle the soil was so poor that could allow only one or two crops a year instead of the seven of the Mexican Highland. In the Eastern Prairies of the USA a plot could be exploited continually for twelve years at most, but the Iroquois fields were so fertile that could lie fallow about twice in a generation. Since the Indian tools were so simple, the prairies of Iowa were virgin in precolumbian times and had to wait for northern plow and McCormick machines to give their crops to the farmers and become today's heart of the American Corn Belt .

 

 

Zea Mais: a genetic masterpiece

by F. Busatta

Most scholars agree that maize was domesticated in southern Mexico, in about 5000 b.C, producing a popcorn in which every kernel is closed in an individual pod; this pod-popcorn from the Tehuacan valley is more primitive than the Chapalote and Nal-Tel Mexican types and can interbreed with teosinte, a wild graminaceous plant. Modern maize shows affinities with teosinte as well as tripsacum , another graminaceous spread from Indiana (USA) to Colombia. Since maize has to be fecundated intervening on the "flowers", prehistoric Indian women could experiment every kind of breed. Mexican breeds can be divided into four groups: Ancient Indigenous, Pre-Columbian Exotic, Prehistoric Mestizos and Modern Incipient.

The Ancient Indigenous variety includes the primitive types deriving from Puebla pod-popcorn and spreading northward and southward. Pre-Columbian Exotic is thought to have been created in South America and diffuse north, Prehistoric Mestizos are related to the dent corn of southeastern United States and Modern Incipient developed in post- columbian times and has not reached yet fully stabilized hybrids.

A very old type called Hohokam-Basket Maker developed in 200-100 AD. from Pre-Columbian Exotic and is still planted by the Pimas, Papagos and Yumas, while other Indians bred the flint and dent types in Eastern USA and the Prairies, which gave origin to the modern corn grown in the Corn Belt.

 

Follows a card on Zea mais: a description of the plant and its active principles not only as food but also as a drug. Another card on pellagra and regional Italian names of corn.

 

 

Maize and farmers in the Upper Missouri

From the Introduction of G. F.Will and G. E. Hyde's Corn among the Indians of the Upper Missouri a good example of the (white) farmer's conservatism. With the first knowledge of corn and its culture received from the tribes near the coast from New England to Virginia and Carolina the American farmer has felt, generally, that there was nothing further to be learned from the Indians about corn. The first settlers in the Upper Missouri failed to understand that each region presented different conditions of soil and climate, that could be won more easily copying the methods of the resident tribes. Only some Indian agent experimented with corn at an early date, but for the most part the corn they tried was from the east and, as the frontier moved up the Missouri valley into South Dakota, the triumphal progress of the dent corns began to slacken. In this region the flint and flour corns of the Rees and Mandans were reputed for their extreme hardiness. The common cry of the opponents of the native flints was that corn of this type grew so low that the ears were very hard to gather, but this problem was overcome by progress in mechanization. When interest in this flint corns was revived, at first it was supposed that many of these varieties had been lost and that others had been permitted to degenerate into the condition of mere squaw corn. As work progressed it was learned that a surprising number of the old varieties still existed in pure or almost pure strains. Altogether some fifty varieties have been found among the tribes that formerly practised agriculture in the Missouri valley, not including any of the Sioux.

 

 

The Origin of Maize

Arthur C. Parker in Iroquois Uses of Maize and Other Food Plants begins a short story of the names of maize, with the Latin zea, from the Greek word zao, meaning "to live", a most appropriate name for the plant the Iroquois called "our life" or "it sustains us". The names applied to maize during the 16th century in Europe have confused some writers. In fact it was variously called Roman corn, Turkish wheat, Sicilian corn and so on. Turkish wheat was the name generally used by the English. Maize was imported in China in mid 17th century and in India in the 18th, but in the latter country flourished for long only as an ornamental grass.

 

 

The Farmer's Toil

Don C. Talayesva, Sun Chief of the Hopi, had his autobiography written in 1938-42 collaborating with L. W. Simmons. In it he remembers that farming was the hardest task for him. He had to fence his fields to keep donkeys off the corn and to participate to all the kachina dances to help the rain to come. He first planted sweet corn and protected it from wind, mice and worms with some grass, small wood sticks and old cans. When the Sun Chief stated it was the right time, he planted melons, pumpkins and beans, then white and blue corn, hoping it was not too late to escape sand drifts. Many men helped him to dig, because he had helped them before: the holes were very deep, the soil hard and the farmers tormented by a hot and strong wind sweeping the fields. It was a good thing avoiding sexual intercourse among the corn plants, in order not to offend the Corn Maidens, and running along the borders to invite corn to grow fast. Nobody threw things to others to escape hail and nobody touched corpses. Many old people ordered the clouds to help the Hopi and rain, but he was not able to do so.

Quotations on maize and the Indians from:

W.H. Prescott," The great staple of the country, as indeed of the American continent, was maize, or Indian corn, which grew freely along the valleys and up the steep sides of the Cordilleras to the high level of the tableland. The Aztecs were as curious in its preparation, and as well instructed in its manifold uses, as the most expert New England housewife. Its gigantic stalks, in these equinoctial regions, afford a saccharine matter not found to the same extent in northern latitudes, and supplied the natives with sugar little inferior to that of cane itself".(Conquest of Mexico, 1866)

John Fiske, "Maize or Indian corn  could be planted without clearing or plowing the soil. It was only necessary to girdle the trees with a stone hatchet, so as to destroy their leaves and let in the sunshine. A few scratches and digs were made in the ground with a stone digger, and the seed once dropped in took care of itself. The ears could hang for weeks after ripening and could be picked off without meddling with the stalk; there was no need of threshing or winnowing. None of the Old World cereals can be cultivated without much more industry and intelligence. At the same time when Indian corn is sown on tilled land it yields with little labor more than twice as much per acre than any other grain". (Discovery of America)

John Lawson, "The Indian corn or Maize proves the most useful grain in the world; and had it not been for the fruitfulness of this species, it would have proved very difficult to have settled some of the plantations in America. It is very nourishing whether in bread, sodden or otherwise; and those poor Christian servants in Virginia, Maryland and the other northerly plantations, that have been forced to live wholly upon it do manifestly prove that it is the most nourishing grain for a man to subsist on, without any other victuals."(History of Carolina, 1714). This emphatic description is either false or interested. In fact nobody can survive only eating maize, without getting pellagra for want of salt or other serious diseases for want of meat. Authors have thought that Aztec cannibalism was partly provoked by scarce game.

G.F. Will-G.E. Hyde describe corn in Upper Missouri, from Pawnee corn going south the size of the plant and the ears decrease as well as the length of the ripening season. This speaks of the extreme hardiness of the Indian species, while a crop failure occurs very rarely. Another characteristic of the northern corn is its bushy foliage that is preserved in its hybrids as a typical trait.

Father Gabriel Sagard, a French Recollect, described the work of the Huron women in his Le Grand Voyage du Pays des Hurons, 1623-24. The women chose the kernels, damped them in water and put nine or ten of them in the holes made with a digging stick. Their weeding was so good that the paths between the rows looked so much as roads that the priest sometimes got lost more easily there than in the forest. He described the plant, which is much better than in Canada or in France. This corn ripened in four months and in some places in three. They collect the ears and put them upside down in great bunches hanging from poles forming racks in the longhouse. Once dried the crop was put into great birchbark containers.

 

 

Myth & Motif: The Butterfly Throughout Time & Place.

by Howard L. Meredith, Ph.D. Cookson Institute, Oklahoma City 1994

Traditional Native American cultures incorporate butterflies into their tribal mythologies and imagery in recognition of their significance and beauty. The symbolism of the butterfly remains a fascinating one that links all of creation to the center in a variety of ways. Certain myths and symbols have circulated throughout the Americas. These are spread orally, in painting and pictographs, and within the weaving in cloth and basketry. Each is the image of a well defined cultural complex. The butterfly image discloses centering images for various Native American peoples. Some of the most dramatic images of the butterfly exist in the region of the arid Southwest. The Jemez butterflies are shared with the other Eastern Pueblos and the color symbolism represents plants and weather from the directions. The Jemez songs concerning butterflies tell of wooing the Rain Spirits to come and play with the Corn Maidens, the Vine Maidens, the Cloud Spirit Maidens. Among the nearby Hopi people, the butterfly serves as a messenger of good times and in many legends the insect is present to lure young people away from danger. Highly conventionalized butterflies appear in ancient Hopi pottery as well as modern Hopi and Zuni one, in the Hopi Butterfly Dance and the tablets dances of the Rio Grande Tewa Pueblos as the symbol of the beneficence of summer. Among the Nahuatl speaking peoples butterflies serve as sacred symbols of rebirth and carriers of the souls of dead warriors, the eternal sundancers, when they return to earth. The American Southwestern Papago tell a wonderful story of the first butterflies and butterflies appear in various Navajo sandpaintings. Ojibwa tales from north among the Great Lakes include this colored being and in the Central Andes of Peru it serves as the primary design motif in Quechua weaving related to birth, growth and fertility. Stylized with centers and boundaries, the images of the butterflies are still comparable upon the plane of imagery and symbolism, although the cultures are not interchangeable. The image provide openings into a trans-historical world. The butterfly and its symbolic meanings in the Americas constitute another opening on the true reality of the world.

 

 

Interview to Sub-comandante Marcos.

Aguascalientes, Chiapas, Mexico, 9 August 1994

by C. Albertani

Why the name of Aguascalientes, why a Convention?

Because we wanted to remember two people removed from history books: Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata. We are commemorating the effort they made in a difficult time to come to an agreement with society at large. Therefore we have built a village inside the jungle and a tower we have named "hope's tower". In Mexico there are two opposite national projects, one looking for change at any cost, the other trying to delay it also at any cost. The Convention is a contribute to the research of a pacific way to give a new look to our country.

Are you satisfied with the results?

First of all we are happy of being alive. Here we are surrounded by 30.000 soldiers who would be glad to "interview" us. Second, we consider a victory having so many people to meet here, having them to come here and, above all, having reached a minimum of consensus. The Convention does not end today. We must go to the factories, neighborhoods, rural villages, we must speak to the people.

What is the EZLN going to do if the PRI will win the elections or if there will be an electoral fraud?

The EZLN has decided to submit to the Convention. In the unfortunate case that the PRI wins the elections, we will feel the nation's pulse and do what it decides.

Will the regime accept your offer of giving up armed struggle?

We never said we will surrender our weapons, but we have said we are willing to open to a pacific transition. Now the government cannot say that they refuse to listen to a hood or a gun's voice. Here there are people with no hood or weapons that spoke with a louder voice than ours. They must listen to them.

You caused the birth of a great popular movement. Your function is important. Are you going to become a political party?

We do not think we have caused the birth of a popular movement, because it already existed. I would rather say we have given a voice to the voiceless. In any case, we are not looking for power and we are not becoming a political party. We want to join our forces with those who want the same things we want, even if without weapons. The CND is the first step towards this scope. I repeat it: we do have neither will nor the capacity to govern the country. The people meeting here have the capacity of doing it.

What will the EZLN do if the country's other armed groups do not accept the Convention's guidelines?

The EZLN will use its ascendancy to explain to them what has happened here. The armies defining themselves as revolutionaries cannot rise against the people's will. And the people wants peace. We believe these groups are mature enough to understand that.

The example of the EZLN will spread to the other Latin American countries?

We are not interested in resurrecting extinct guerrilla warfare. We are interested in renewing the struggle for dignity. The great lies of the new international order, neo-free trade or social liberalism do not sell any more. Here in the mountains of southeastern Mexico a crevice opened and others are opening in the rest of the continent. The story is not over: it is at the beginning. And it is not favoring the powerful, but those that, till now, have not had yet the possibility to say: we have won.

 

 

Chiapas: Maya Identity and the Zapatista Upraising

by Araceli Buruete Cal y Mayor

The vast majority of the Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN) fighters are Indigenous Maya Tojolabal, Tzeltal, Tzotzil and Chole peoples in addition to a smaller number of mestizos and other ethnic groups. Their demands are diverse, oscillating between those raised by the revolutionary class-oriented movements of Central America, classic Mexican campesino (peasant) demands, and the claims being made by the Indigenous movement. The EZLN has also incorporated into its positions a wide range of demands relating to the urban movement's struggles, the political parties, and to the demands for democracy voiced by the Mexican society in general. The Zapatista rebellion is embedded in the historic and geographic specificities of Chiapas. The conflict developed in the highland and border area. The highlands are the ancestral territory of the rebellion's principal actors, the Maya peoples. The border region, which includes the Lacandon rainforest, has received waves of migrant Indians fron the highlands over the last 30 years. It now constitutes the regional and social base of the Zapatista army.

Indian people have paid an extremely high price to maintain their identity. Indian rebellions have been as much a constant of Chiapas' history as has the exploitation and oppression which followed the conquest. During Mexico's first period of Liberal reforms in the 19th century, landholding families headed the counter-reform. Debt peonage was progressively eliminated in the rest of Mexico following the revolution of 1910. In Chiapas, however, several hundred Indigenous people continue, even today, to work as indebted peons on the large plantations. Just as the counter-reform gripped Chiapas in the 19th century, the state's landlords also won the 20th century's counter-revolution. The counter- revolutionaries threatened secession from the Union, and the federal government was forced to negotiate. The cost has been too high. The revolution's institutions which are ubiquitous in the rest of Mexico, never arrived in Chiapas. Due to its regressive agraria policy most of the state's arable land was concentrated in a few hands by 1940. At the same time, a significant proportion of the state corresponded to "National Lands", that is forest areas susceptible to colonization. Population growth and the exhaustion of the ancestral Indigenous territories, government support for forest colonization, the displacement resulting from construction of hydroelectric dams, the advent of oil exploitation, soil deterioration, political and religious persecution and violence between 1960 and 1980 led to accelerated colonization of the Lacandon. This region is characterized by steep slopes and extremely poor soils underlain by calcareous rock. These soils retain water poorly; making agriculture is very difficult. The region's physical harshness further sharpened social discontent. The Indigenous colonists adapted to life in the forest only after profound cultural, political and ideological changes. These strengthened their nascent campesino identity, substituting for their communal (indian) identity. The rainforest's new colonists and their young descendants are the protagonists of the conflict in Chiapas. Struggle for land in Chiapas has always been a radical process subject to violence from landlords. The federal government's general agrarian reform policy emphasized the ejido form of tenure (individual and sub-divided) in detriment to traditional communal tenure. In this way, Indigenous peopole partecipating in the struggle for land assumed a campesinista consciousness through which they demanded land to work rather than the autonomous territories which were stolen during the European invasion. This campesino-class consciousness has homogenized the struggle of the Indigenous peoples of Chiapas. The figure of Emiliano Zapata has been continuously invoked to support land struggles, whereas the indigenous struggles for recovery of Indian government were forgotten with the oral history of the traditional Indian communities.

The state's first Indigenous Encounter in October 1974, hosted by Catholic Bishop Ruiz, marked the beginning of the campesino and indigenous mobilization in the region. This process was accelerated with the arrival in these years of several political organizations with different ideological tendencies. A significant number of the members of these various organizations have presumably joined the ranks of the EZLN. The formation of Indigenous organizations that assume a humanitarian banner is a recent activity that has not been able to establish itself significantly in the consciousness of the Indigenous peoples. The Campesina and Zapatista tradition has until now subjugated Indianist efforts. The majority of the Indianist organization were formed by Indigenous activists that had experiences in the campesina struggle, but whom in a recent process of re-indianization have begun to base their claims and organization in their Indian identity. Some members of these organizations also joined the EZLN. The differences between the Campesinista Indigenous movement and the Indianist Indigenous movement are clear. The Zapatista demands arise from both these traditions which follow the campesinista line, but at the same time, identify in the Indianist demands possibilities for ending colonial oppression. This most recent indigenous uprising in Chiapas has given new air to the Indigenous movement in Mexico. Nevertheless, the most important thing is the hope that it has brought to the Indigenous movement worldwide. The sympathy which the EZLN provoked in the world shows that the Indigenous struggles have reason and justice on their side.

 

 

The Case of the Western Shoshone

The Western Shoshone called themselves Newe (people); they lived and still live in the area of the Great Basin of the USA, a harsh and dry land that forced them to travel across a wide range of ecologic niches to fully exploit their resources seasonally. This harsh environment made them wander in small familiar groups and avoid armed clashed with more than one or two victims. This cultural trait made them be despised by the Plains Indians, who often sold them as slaves, and the Whites as well, who called them Diggers and often killed them for no reason. The colonization of the Far West meant disaster for their environmental resources and their way of life; forced to struggle they ended the conflict signing the Ruby Valley Treaty in 1863 and ratified by Congress in 1864. It was one of those standard treaties the US commissioners made the western tribes sign, full of clauses concerning passage rights for the railway posts and so on. It meant the end of the Newe's way of life. Things worsened in 1898, when the government began to label Newe's lands as state lands, even if nobody had sold them or ratified any cession. Citizenship in 1924 allowed the Newe to ask the respect of their treaty rights in front of a Congress commission, but the Indian Reorganization Act in 1934 provoked a split between the "progressives" and the "Tradistionalists". After the creation of the Indian Claims Commission in 1946 a lawyer's firm, Wilkinson, Cragun and Barker, became trustees for the Western Shoshone in 1951 and, unbeknown to the Indians, they asked the ICC to grant an indemnity for the loss of their land even if only 10% of it had been occupied by the whites. In the same year the first atomic experiment was made in the Nevada Test Site, within Western Shoshone land, but the Indians were not warned of the danger. From that time the Newe have begun to struggle against nuclear fallout and the military's management of their territory; among the many battles we remember that against the infamous MX missile system. In 1962 the ICC stated that, even if there Western Shoshone had never been formally expropriated of their land, the whites' gradual squatting gave them a title of possession. The issue of the Newe's lands was "closed" by the firm naming 8 Indians willing to collaborate as tribal representatives, recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), while the ICC arbitrarily fixed the beginning of white occupation on July 1, 1872. Thanks to a new law in 1968 the Newe could see the documents of their case, while in 1974 the Dann case broke out. Dann vs. USA has become a symbol of the struggle of the traditionalists, that refused money compensation for the loss of their land and brought their case to the Fourth Russell Tribunal in Rotterdam in 1980. The Dann case had a violent conclusion, with the police assaulting their ranch and the State Land Management reducing their cattle, in spite of international support and the creation of the Dann Defense Project. In 1993 the Dann sisters received the Alternative Nobel Award and in 1994 the Secretary of the Interior received various delegations of Western Shoshone asking the respect of the Ruby Valley Treaty and the Western Shoshone Council asking for their recognition as the true Indian government, enfranchised from American guardianship. In July 1994 the Western Shoshone partecipated to the session on Indigenous populations in Geneva, Switzerland and, since there was also the Conference on Disarmament they intervened denouncing the dangers they are suffering in an area of nuclear weapons tests: The USA and Great Britain made explode 926 nuclear bombs and this can well be considered a genocidal war against the Newe. To worsen an already appalling situation the USA government is considering to enlarge its deposits in Newe land to stock commercial nucear waste, negotiating it with the elective tribal officiale and without consulting all the interested parts


People interested to the articles not on line, can e-mail the editors.



Back to English Abstract Index

Back to the Home Page



summary

links

who


info@hakomagazine.net